My Photo

Justia Family Law Blawgs

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Top 100 Family Law Blogs

All Top Family Law Blogs

Top Family Law Blogs



« HPV Vaccine: Mandatory for Teenagers or Not? | Main | Soccer Moms and Adopting a Team »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Darrick Scott-Farnsworth

Subject: Supreme Court overturned 14-years of judicial precedent based on Troxel v. Granville

January 18, 2007

State High Court Protects Parents Against In-law Intrusion

Maryland's highest court on Friday overturned 14-years of state judicial precedent and said that absent exceptional circumstances or parental unfitness, and detriment to the grandchildren, grandparents have no right to brush aside parents' wishes and demand visitation with grandchildren. The court lined up squarely with principles announced in 2000 by the United States Supreme Court in Troxel vs. Granville.

The family wanted to limit the time the grandparents spent with their children. The grandparents filed suit and demanded that the court order the parents to give them more time with the grandchildren.

A Maryland statute allowed a judge to order grandparent visitation if the judge thought it was in "the best interests of the child." This subjective standard gave judges a blank check to substitute their own judgment for that of parents.

On appeal, however, the Maryland high court ruled that it is unconstitutional for a judge to usurp parental discretion unless "exceptional circumstances" are present, or the parents have been determined to be unfit, and there would be detriment to the grandchildren. The high court sent the case back down to the trial court to determine this.

The high court recognized the right to parental autonomy and said that when the trial court considers the case again, the parents must be given the benefit of a presumption that parents act in the best interest of their children. This is in keeping with previous decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The court strictly scrutinized the grandparent visitation statute because parents' rights to determine whom their children spend time with is a right of high constitutional magnitude-a "fundamental" right. This right takes priority over a right established only by state statutes, such as grandparent visitation.

The right to educate one's own children does not stand in isolation. It is supported by other rights: the right of parents to control the upbringing of their children; and (often) the right to the free exercise of one's religion. Home School Legal Defense Association protects these underlying rights in order to protect the right to home education itself. We applaud the decision of the high court. We plan to follow up and evaluate whether Maryland law needs to be amended to line up with the high court's decision.

Now tell me that Michigan's Judge/FOC determined Best Interest Criteria still is what should be the law over Equal Child Custody Presumption. If it is the parents right to determine what's best how can one be granted higher authority without a finding of unfitness?


I'm curious as to sibling rights within Michigan. Are there any acts currently in Michigan Law similar to that of Illinois?

The comments to this entry are closed.


March 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Other Resources


Blog powered by Typepad