Today's guest author is Scott Bassett, a Michigan Family Law Appellate lawyer.
Once again a panel of the Michigan Court of Appeals misunderstood the facts of Lentz v Lentz, 271 Mich App 465 (2006), and improperly relied on it to declare a post-nup agreement void as against public policy because the parties "were not separated" when the agreement was signed. This perspective is, of course, contrary to the clear trend in Michigan case law recognizing that adults are free to enter into binding contracts on property, spousal support, and even child support (with some limitations) issues.
Yesterday the C of A decided Cheff v Cheff, which you will find here:
The Cheff panel quoted from the "bad facts make bad law" Wright v Wright, 278 Mich App 291 (2008), decision, stating:
Continue reading "Michigan Court of Appeals Gets it Wrong Again on Post-Nuptial Agreements" »










