What is it that makes some parents decide that it is up to them to decide whether their child or children should be with the other parent--or that "If I can't have them neither can you?"
Today's news report states that there is new evidence concerning the three Skelton boys who have been missing since Thanksgiving in lower Michigan. Darling boys, really. John Skelton was caring for the boys, only 5, 7 and 9, went they went missing after Thanksgiving. John claims he gave the kids to an organization, but he claims he doesn't know any last names and therefore he cannot provide any details about the group to authorities.
John has been charged with kidnapping charges and his trial is set to begin in mid-August. Morenci’s police chief is calling the disappearance a murder investigation, but John hasn't yet been charged with murder. See Channel WXYZ coverage on this case here. [Last accessed July 11, 2011]
In another case of "I don't want him but you can't have him," a 1996 case bumped onto my radar screen today when I heard from my former client. He has a child who has a unique heritage. He is Chinese-American. My friend and former client was born in Taiwan and later was brought with his family to the United States.
My former client, who has remained a friend after the representation, sent an email today saying that his 16-year-old son was now living with an unknown third party. In 1995, the mother kidnapped their child in utero, tricking his father into giving her thousands of dollars that she used to move to Michigan from northern California.Then she invited him to join her in Michigan for the birth. Hmm. Not such a good idea. It turns out she just wanted court jurisdiction for her paternity and support case. Not long after the child's birth, she charged him with domestic abuse (thrown out). But she never wanted to share the child.
My friend's extended efforts to have a parent-child relationship were extensive and expensive. It took a court hearing to get the child on a plane almost every time. Then there'd be a court hearing after the parenting time because the play therapist said that the child, upon return, exhibited violent play demonstrating that in her professional opinion, the child should not be forced to have parening time with his father.
Today's report is that the mother emailed him telling him that his son is back in our community. She declined to tell him with whom the child is living. He wants to know whether his parental rights trump third party rights, and of course I assured him that they do. But he worries about how the mother has convinced their child that everything that has happened in the past 16 years is Dad's fault. The child has expressed hatred for his father.
As family lawyers, my colleagues and I see all manner of sad cases. I tell all of my child-related clients that "no one wins. Everybody loses." The real question is: How significant are those losses to be?